Gem Wallet vs Status

How Gem Wallet vs Status compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Status4.0/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.6/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.5
Ease of use4.53.5
Chain support5.03.0
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.05.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile, Browser extension, Desktop
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, OtherEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android, Chrome, Windows, macOS, Linux
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking YesNot disclosed
NFT support Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresBiometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryptionKeycard hardware wallet integration, Peer-to-peer messaging encryption, Local key storage, Device-level transaction confirmation
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Built-in dApp browser Yes Yes
Swap fee0.5%Not disclosed
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20232017
HeadquartersUnited Arab Emirates—
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open-source mobile application audited by CertiK in April 2026
  • Requires no account creation, email address, or identity verification
  • Supports over 100 distinct blockchains within a single interface
  • Integrated DEX aggregator compares routes across 23 swap providers
  • Fully open-source codebase across desktop, mobile, and browser extensions
  • No phone number, email address, or identity verification required for setup
  • Hardware wallet integration supported through contactless Keycard devices
  • Integrated cross-chain bridging across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base
Cons
  • No desktop client or web browser extension available
  • Swaps carry a 0.5% fee in addition to standard network costs
  • No social recovery alternative for the seed phrase
  • No support for Bitcoin, Solana, or other non-EVM blockchains
  • Collectibles cannot be moved across chains using the native bridge
  • Standalone Web3 browser deprecated in newer versions in favor of WalletConnect
  • No social recovery options if recovery phrases are lost
Best forMobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchangesPrivacy-focused Ethereum ecosystem users, Traders using EVM Layer 2 networks, Communities using token-gated chat rooms

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons