Status vs Wallet Labs: EVM Messenger vs 100+ Chains

Status is an open-source, self-custodial wallet and encrypted messaging app built for Ethereum and Layer-2 rollups like Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism. Wallet Labs develops Gem Wallet, an open-source mobile wallet that supports more than 100 blockchains, including Bitcoin, Solana, and TRON. Neither application requires identity verification or account registration to use.

Network scope and platform reach mark the primary differences between the two. Status supports only EVM networks, but it runs across iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux, and Chrome. It pairs on-chain management with peer-to-peer messaging and contactless Keycard hardware integration. Wallet Labs limits Gem Wallet to mobile operating systems, yet it covers non-EVM chains and includes in-app staking. Swapping through Wallet Labs incurs a 0.5% fee across 23 routing providers, whereas Status routes EVM bridge transfers and deducts network expenses directly from the transacted sum.

Status4.0/5
VS

Quick verdict

The choice between these two self-custodial tools centers on platform flexibility versus chain variety. Status is built for users who want desktop and browser accessibility alongside private communication, but it restricts accounts strictly to Ethereum and its Layer-2 networks. Wallet Labs suits mobile users who manage varied holdings across Bitcoin, Solana, and EVM chains from a single smartphone app.

Status works best for Ethereum specialists. Choose it if you trade exclusively within that ecosystem and want access on desktop or Chrome alongside decentralized messaging, community channels, and contactless Keycard hardware integration without added app fees on swaps.

Choose Wallet Labs if you need a single mobile wallet for non-EVM assets like Bitcoin, Solana, and TRON. It offers built-in staking alongside cross-chain swaps through 23 decentralized providers, though standard trading pairs carry a 0.5% app fee on top of network costs.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.5
Ease of use3.54.5
Chain support3.05.0
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.05.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, Browser extension, DesktopMobile
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, Chrome, Windows, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support YesNot disclosed
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
NFT support Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnect YesNot disclosed
Security featuresKeycard hardware wallet integration, Peer-to-peer messaging encryption, Local key storage, Device-level transaction confirmationBiometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryption
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Built-in dApp browser Yes Yes
Swap feeNot disclosed0.5%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20172023
Headquarters—United Arab Emirates
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open-source codebase across desktop, mobile, and browser extensions
  • No phone number, email address, or identity verification required for setup
  • Hardware wallet integration supported through contactless Keycard devices
  • Integrated cross-chain bridging across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base
  • Fully open-source mobile application audited by CertiK in April 2026
  • Requires no account creation, email address, or identity verification
  • Supports over 100 distinct blockchains within a single interface
  • Integrated DEX aggregator compares routes across 23 swap providers
Cons
  • No support for Bitcoin, Solana, or other non-EVM blockchains
  • Collectibles cannot be moved across chains using the native bridge
  • Standalone Web3 browser deprecated in newer versions in favor of WalletConnect
  • No social recovery options if recovery phrases are lost
  • No desktop client or web browser extension available
  • Swaps carry a 0.5% fee in addition to standard network costs
  • No social recovery alternative for the seed phrase
Best forPrivacy-focused Ethereum ecosystem users, Traders using EVM Layer 2 networks, Communities using token-gated chat roomsMobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchanges

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

FAQ

Does Status support more blockchains than Wallet Labs?

No, Status supports fewer blockchains than Wallet Labs. Status works exclusively with Ethereum and EVM Layer-2 rollups like Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism. Wallet Labs supports over 100 distinct networks, including Bitcoin, Solana, and TRON.

Can you use Status or Wallet Labs on a desktop computer?

Status is available on desktop, whereas Wallet Labs is not. Status provides native clients for Windows, macOS, and Linux alongside a Chrome browser extension. Wallet Labs operates solely as a mobile application for iOS and Android.

Which wallet charges higher swap fees?

Wallet Labs charges higher native swap fees, adding a 0.5% fee on standard trades and 0.25% on stablecoins. Status does not add a percentage-based app swap fee, charging only the underlying network and route bridging costs.

Do Status and Wallet Labs require KYC identity verification?

Neither wallet requires KYC verification or account registration. Both applications store private keys locally on your device, protected by password encryption or biometric device authentication and standard recovery phrases.

More comparisons