Cake Wallet vs Gem Wallet

How Cake Wallet vs Gem Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/54.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.5
Ease of use4.04.5
Chain support4.05.0
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.05.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support YesNot disclosed
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
NFT supportNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeeBiometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryption
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Built-in dApp browser No Yes
Swap feeNot disclosed0.5%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20182023
Headquarters—United Arab Emirates
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Fully open-source mobile application audited by CertiK in April 2026
  • Requires no account creation, email address, or identity verification
  • Supports over 100 distinct blockchains within a single interface
  • Integrated DEX aggregator compares routes across 23 swap providers
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • No desktop client or web browser extension available
  • Swaps carry a 0.5% fee in addition to standard network costs
  • No social recovery alternative for the seed phrase
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsMobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchanges

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons