OneKey vs Trezor
How OneKey vs Trezor compare on our ratings, hardware wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Build & design | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Coin support | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Value for money | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Not disclosed |
| Price from | $79 | Not disclosed |
| Connectivity | USB-C, Bluetooth | Not disclosed |
| Secure element | Yes | Yes |
| Firmware | Fully open source | Fully open source |
| Display | Screen + buttons | Not disclosed |
| Air-gapped signing | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Bitcoin-only | No | No |
| Supported assets | 30,000 | 1,000 |
| BIP39 passphrase | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Companion app | OneKey app | Trezor Suite |
| Backup options | Not disclosed | Wallet backup, Recovery phrase |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong | Czech Republic |
| Investors | YZi Labs | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Long-term multi-chain self-custody, Open-source firmware users, Bitcoin-only cold storage | Long-term crypto self-custody, Open-source wallet users, Multichain asset holders |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

