ELLIPAL vs OneKey: Air-gapped simplicity or open-source range
ELLIPAL and OneKey make self-custody hardware wallets, but their designs take different paths. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 signs transactions through QR codes and has no USB or Bluetooth connection. OneKey Classic 1S connects through Bluetooth or USB-C, supports browser wallets and dApps, and uses Clear Signing and Sign Guard for transaction review.
Pricing also separates the two brands. Titan 2.0 costs $169, while OneKey Classic 1S starts at $99 and Classic 1S Pure starts at $79. Asset support reaches more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies on ELLIPAL, compared with more than 100 chains and 30,000 coins and tokens on OneKey. The firmware approach differs as well: ELLIPAL uses closed-source code, whereas OneKey pairs open-source firmware and apps with reproducible builds and SlowMist audits.
Quick verdict
The deciding difference is the connection and transparency model. ELLIPAL keeps Titan 2.0 physically separated from the phone, with QR-only signing, a sealed metal body and a CC EAL5+ secure element. OneKey gives up that strict connection barrier for Bluetooth, USB-C, browser-wallet access and dApp connections. Its Classic 1S also uses an EAL6+ secure element, while open-source firmware, reproducible builds and third-party audits make the software easier to inspect. OneKey had unauthorized hardware reported through the former CryptoBilis reseller in July 2026, and its authorized-reseller status ended that month.
Choose ELLIPAL if a $169 wallet with QR-only signing and physical separation from the phone matters more than open-source firmware or direct connections. Its self-custody model fits long-term storage, but opening the device can wipe stored data, and the mobile workflow runs through the ELLIPAL app on iOS and Android.
Choose OneKey if a lower starting price, open-source code, more than 100 chains, or dApp and browser-wallet access matter more. Classic 1S Pure starts at $79 and has no battery, while Classic 1S costs $99 and includes Bluetooth and USB-C connectivity. Both products keep signing keys in self-custody.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.1/5 | 4.1/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Build & design | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Coin support | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Value for money | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Not disclosed | No |
| Price from | $169 | $79 |
| Connectivity | QR code (air-gapped), microSD | USB-C, Bluetooth |
| Secure element | Yes | Yes |
| Firmware | Closed source | Fully open source |
| Display | Touchscreen | Screen + buttons |
| Air-gapped signing | Yes | Yes |
| Bitcoin-only | No | No |
| Supported assets | 10,000 | 30,000 |
| Battery | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Companion app | ELLIPAL mobile app for iOS and Android | OneKey app |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Backup options | Seed phrase recovery sheets, MicroSD card | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | Hong Kong |
| Investors | Not disclosed | YZi Labs |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Long-term self-custody, QR-based transaction signing, Touchscreen wallet users | Long-term multi-chain self-custody, Open-source firmware users, Bitcoin-only cold storage |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.
FAQ
Is ELLIPAL cheaper than OneKey?
ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 costs $169, which is more expensive than the OneKey Classic 1S at $99 and the Classic 1S Pure at $79.
Which has more asset support, ELLIPAL or OneKey?
OneKey lists the wider support range, with more than 100 chains and 30,000 coins and tokens. ELLIPAL supports more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies.
Is ELLIPAL more isolated from connected devices?
Titan 2.0 provides greater physical isolation by relying on QR-code signing without USB or Bluetooth, whereas OneKey Classic 1S supports Bluetooth and USB-C connections.
Which has open-source firmware?
OneKey has open-source firmware and apps with reproducible builds and SlowMist audits. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 uses proprietary, closed-source firmware.
Are ELLIPAL and OneKey self-custody wallets?
Yes. Both keep signing keys in self-custody, so recovery material and device security remain with the owner.