Gem Wallet vs ShapeShift

How Gem Wallet vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.6/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Chain support5.04.5
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking Yes Yes
NFT support YesNot disclosed
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresBiometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryptionNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser YesNot disclosed
Swap fee0.5%0%
Company
Founded20232014
HeadquartersUnited Arab EmiratesSwitzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open-source mobile application audited by CertiK in April 2026
  • Requires no account creation, email address, or identity verification
  • Supports over 100 distinct blockchains within a single interface
  • Integrated DEX aggregator compares routes across 23 swap providers
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • No desktop client or web browser extension available
  • Swaps carry a 0.5% fee in addition to standard network costs
  • No social recovery alternative for the seed phrase
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forMobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchangesKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons