Gem Wallet vs Ownbit

How Gem Wallet vs Ownbit compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Ownbit3.7/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.6/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.0
Ease of use4.53.5
Chain support5.04.5
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.04.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, OtherBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Optimism, Tron, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Open source Yes No
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed No
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking YesNot disclosed
NFT support Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app YesNot disclosed
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresBiometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryptionAir-gapped QR signing, Multi-signature (m-of-n), Biometric authentication (Face ID), Local key encryption, BIP39 recovery phrase
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Passkey loginNot disclosed No
MultisigNot disclosed Yes
Built-in dApp browser Yes Yes
Swap fee0.5%Not disclosed
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20232018
HeadquartersUnited Arab EmiratesSingapore
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open-source mobile application audited by CertiK in April 2026
  • Requires no account creation, email address, or identity verification
  • Supports over 100 distinct blockchains within a single interface
  • Integrated DEX aggregator compares routes across 23 swap providers
  • Eliminates dedicated hardware wallet costs by using offline smartphones as air-gapped signers
  • Self-custodial keys remain encrypted locally without central server custody
  • Supports native multisig on Bitcoin, XRP Ledger, and Stellar without third-party smart contracts
  • No identity verification or account KYC required to set up wallets
Cons
  • No desktop client or web browser extension available
  • Swaps carry a 0.5% fee in addition to standard network costs
  • No social recovery alternative for the seed phrase
  • No commercial third-party security audits completed for application code
  • Advanced multisig tiers require annual subscriptions ranging from $69 to $599
  • Forgotten wallet passwords cannot be recovered without an offline seed phrase backup
  • Desktop and browser extension interfaces are unavailable
Best forMobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchangesTeams managing multi-signature treasury assets, Users creating air-gapped phone cold storage, Self-custody setups requiring no KYC

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons