Gem Wallet vs Klever Wallet
How Gem Wallet vs Klever Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.6/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Chain support | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Privacy | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Wallet type | Mobile | Mobile, Browser extension |
| Custody | Self-custodial | Self-custodial |
| Chains | Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos, TON, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, Other | Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Tron, Other |
| Platforms | iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Chrome |
| Open source | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Hardware wallet support | Not disclosed | Yes |
| In-app swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| NFT support | Yes | Yes |
| Buy crypto in app | Yes | Yes |
| Security features | Biometric authentication, 12-word seed phrase backup, Apple Keychain integration, Google Tink encryption | Not disclosed |
| Recovery without a seed phrase | No | Not disclosed |
| Built-in dApp browser | Yes | Yes |
| Swap fee | 0.5% | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | United Arab Emirates | Portugal |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Mobile multichain crypto management, Privacy-focused self-custody, Direct cross-chain swaps without exchanges | Multichain mobile crypto holders, Users staking proof-of-stake assets, Traders wanting non-KYC swaps |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.