Cake Wallet vs MetaMask

How Cake Wallet vs MetaMask compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.04.5
Features4.04.5
Privacy5.03.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Browser extension
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherEthereum
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxChrome, Firefox, Edge, Brave, iOS, Android
Open source YesNot disclosed
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
NFT supportNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeePhishing detection, Transaction protection, Secret Recovery Phrase, MetaMask Snaps
Recovery without a seed phrase No Yes
Built-in dApp browser No Yes
Swap feeNot disclosed0.88%
Perpetuals trading No Yes
Company
Founded20182016
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Self-custodial control across Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana and Tron
  • Available on major browsers, iOS and Android
  • Supports Ledger, Trezor and other hardware wallets
  • Swaps cover major networks with gas included in quotes
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • Users remain responsible for Secret Recovery Phrase loss and phishing
  • MetaMask Swaps charges a 0.875% service fee
  • Perps add liquidation risk and depend on Hyperliquid infrastructure
  • Perps are unavailable in the USA, UK, Ontario and Belgium
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsMultichain self-custody, Ethereum dApp users, Hardware wallet users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons