Keplr vs MetaMask: Cosmos IBC or EVM and Solana

Keplr and MetaMask are self-custodial crypto wallets built for distinct parts of the decentralized ecosystem. Keplr launched in 2021 through Chainapsis, focusing on Cosmos app-chains, Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) routing, and validator governance across almost 350 networks. MetaMask launched in 2016 under ConsenSys. It serves more than 100 million users across Ethereum, layer-2 networks, Bitcoin, and Solana.

The primary differences center on ecosystem integration, supported assets, and trading overhead. Keplr includes native IBC bridging, validator delegation tools, and beta multisig management, charging a 0.75% swap fee. MetaMask provides broader hardware wallet options like Trezor alongside Ledger, as well as perpetual futures trading with up to 50x leverage. Its swap markup is higher at 0.875%, and its perpetuals feature excludes users in regions such as the United States and the United Kingdom.

Keplr4.1/5
VS

Quick verdict

The choice between these wallets depends on whether your daily activity centers on Cosmos app-chains or EVM networks. Keplr builds its features around Cosmos governance, validator tooling, and IBC transfers, keeping swap fees at 0.75%. MetaMask centers on the broader Ethereum and Solana environments, backing thousands of decentralized applications and offering perpetual contracts alongside a 0.875% swap fee.

Choose Keplr if you trade across the Cosmos ecosystem, stake with chain validators, participate in on-chain governance votes, or manage shared accounts with beta multisig tools. It gives direct access to IBC transfers without manual network configuration, though it lacks native storage for Solana.

Choose MetaMask if you want an account that connects to Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin under one recovery phrase, or if you use hardware signers like Trezor alongside Ledger. It also suits traders who want integrated perpetual futures with isolated margin, provided they reside outside excluded regions like the United States, the United Kingdom, Ontario, and Belgium.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.54.5
Features4.54.5
Privacy3.53.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
Wallet typeMobile, Browser extension, WebMobile, Browser extension
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, BNB Chain, Avalanche, Cosmos, OtherEthereum
PlatformsChrome, Firefox, Edge, iOS, AndroidChrome, Firefox, Edge, Brave, iOS, Android
Open source YesNot disclosed
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking Yes Yes
NFT support Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnect YesNot disclosed
Security featuresHardware wallet integration, 24-word seed phrase, Self-custodyPhishing detection, Transaction protection, Secret Recovery Phrase, MetaMask Snaps
Recovery without a seed phraseNot disclosed Yes
Multisig YesNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser Yes Yes
Swap fee0.75%0.88%
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20212016
Headquarters——
InvestorsBinary Builders, Coinbase VenturesNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Self-custodial wallet with direct Cosmos IBC support
  • Supports almost 350 blockchains and Layer 2 networks
  • Available on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, iOS and Android
  • Includes staking, governance voting and NFT management
  • Self-custodial control across Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana and Tron
  • Available on major browsers, iOS and Android
  • Supports Ledger, Trezor and other hardware wallets
  • Swaps cover major networks with gas included in quotes
Cons
  • Swaps add a 0.75% markup or surcharge
  • Seed-phrase loss can permanently remove access
  • Native storage excludes Solana, Cardano and XRP
  • Multisig remains in beta
  • Users remain responsible for Secret Recovery Phrase loss and phishing
  • MetaMask Swaps charges a 0.875% service fee
  • Perps add liquidation risk and depend on Hyperliquid infrastructure
  • Perps are unavailable in the USA, UK, Ontario and Belgium
Best forCosmos and IBC users, Multichain staking, DAO treasury teamsMultichain self-custody, Ethereum dApp users, Hardware wallet users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

FAQ

Is Keplr cheaper to use for token swaps than MetaMask?

Yes, Keplr charges a lower built-in swap markup. Keplr adds a 0.75% fee to swap transactions, whereas MetaMask Swaps charges a 0.875% service fee on aggregated routes.

Can MetaMask connect to the Cosmos ecosystem?

MetaMask does not offer native Cosmos IBC support out of the box. Keplr provides direct connectivity to almost 350 Cosmos and EVM networks, including IBC token transfers.

Does Keplr support Solana?

No, Keplr lacks native support for Solana, Cardano, and XRP. MetaMask supports Solana addresses alongside EVM networks and Bitcoin under its Multichain Accounts feature.

Which hardware wallets work with both apps?

Both wallets support Ledger hardware devices. MetaMask adds broader support for Trezor, Lattice, Keystone, and AirGap Vault on its browser extension, while Keplr connects to Ledger Nano X.

More comparisons