Sanctum vs Symbiotic

How Sanctum vs Symbiotic compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

Sanctum4.5/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield4.54.0
Security4.53.5
Liquidity5.03.5
Decentralization4.03.5
Ease of use4.53.5
Specs
TypeLiquid stakingRestaking
Stakeable assetsSOLERC-20 tokens
Receipt tokenINF and validator LSTsNot disclosed
Protocol fee0.1%Not disclosed
ChainsSolanaEthereum
Node operatorsPermissionless validator set with custom white-label pools111 operators
Audited Yes Yes
RestakingNot disclosed Yes
Typical reward rate5.65%-5.69%5.82% - 8.11%
Company
Founded—2024
Headquarters—Cayman Islands
InvestorsNot disclosedPantera Capital, Paradigm, cyber•Fund, Coinbase Ventures
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Connects over 1,360 Solana liquid staking tokens into shared liquidity
  • Audited by six firms including Quantstamp, OtterSec, and Halborn
  • Program upgrades secured by an 11-member multi-organization multisig
  • Enables immediate unbonding through liquidity pools rather than epoch waits
  • Supports non-ETH collateral assets like sUSDe and ENA alongside standard staking tokens
  • TVL of approximately $452M supported by 111 independent operators as of October 2026
  • Instant T+0 redemptions for tokenized real-world assets via Liquid Lane
  • Backed by $34.8M in funding from Paradigm, Pantera Capital, and Coinbase Ventures
Cons
  • Withdrawal instructions incur a 0.10% fee
  • Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain
  • Underlying custom LSTs remain subject to individual validator slashing risks
  • Secondary pool trades face potential depeg risk during liquidity shocks
  • Operates strictly on Ethereum mainnet without native multichain deployments
  • Capital is exposed to slashing and multi-protocol default risks
  • Layering capital into lending markets and bridge financing introduces compounded smart contract risk
  • Specific curated vaults depend on third-party liquidity adapters and curator terms
Best forSolana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokensHolders restaking diverse ERC-20 tokens, Institutional RWA redemption providers, Decentralized networks seeking shared security

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons