Jito vs Sanctum: MEV Yield vs Shared LST Liquidity

Jito and Sanctum take distinct approaches to staking SOL on the Solana blockchain. Jito operates a liquid staking pool alongside a custom validator client. Depositors receive JitoSOL, a single receipt token that pools standard inflation rewards with MEV tips captured by the Jito Block Engine. The protocol manages roughly $1.09B in total value locked and charges a 4% protocol fee, with standard unstaking requiring one epoch (about two to three days).

Sanctum is a shared liquidity layer across more than 1,300 custom validator tokens, including jupSOL and bbSOL, while issuing its own yield-bearing basket token, INF. Instead of waiting for epoch boundaries, depositors can swap between assets instantly through the Sanctum Router and Infinity pool. Sanctum applies a 0.1% protocol fee and holds security audits from six independent security firms, including Quantstamp, Halborn, and OtterSec.

Jito4.2/5
VS
Sanctum4.5/5

Quick verdict

The core difference between these Solana protocols lies in token architecture and liquidity access. Jito provides a unified receipt token designed to capture MEV rewards directly from transaction priority tips, backing it with dedicated restaking infrastructure. Sanctum is a routing hub and liquidity engine that provides instant unbonding across hundreds of partner-branded validator tokens.

Choose Jito if you want maximum yield integration from Solana transaction tips and plan to use JitoSOL across Solana lending pools and restaking networks without needing exposure to custom validator tokens.

Choose Sanctum if you want the ability to exit staking positions instantly without waiting several days for epoch unbonding, hold white-label LSTs like jupSOL, or prefer a lower 0.1% protocol fee across a diversified liquidity reserve.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/54.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield4.54.5
Security4.04.5
Liquidity4.55.0
Decentralization4.04.0
Ease of use4.04.5
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
TypeLiquid stakingLiquid staking
Stakeable assetsSOLSOL
Receipt tokenJitoSOLINF and validator LSTs
Protocol fee4%0.1%
Withdrawal time1 epoch (~2-3 days)Not disclosed
ChainsSolanaSolana
Node operatorsJito-Solana validator network via StakeNetPermissionless validator set with custom white-label pools
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking YesNot disclosed
Typical reward rateNot disclosed5.65%-5.69%
Company
Founded2021—
Headquarters——
InvestorsMulticoin Capital, 6th Man Ventures, Framework Ventures, Robot Ventures +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Over $1.09B in TVL on Solana as of October 2026
  • Dual yield stream combining standard staking rewards with MEV tips
  • Requires no KYC checks or identity verification to stake
  • Smart contracts audited by security firm Neodyme
  • Connects over 1,360 Solana liquid staking tokens into shared liquidity
  • Audited by six firms including Quantstamp, OtterSec, and Halborn
  • Program upgrades secured by an 11-member multi-organization multisig
  • Enables immediate unbonding through liquidity pools rather than epoch waits
Cons
  • Restricted strictly to the Solana network
  • Exposed to validator slashing and smart contract exploits
  • JitoSOL secondary market trading carries receipt-token depeg risks
  • Withdrawal instructions incur a 0.10% fee
  • Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain
  • Underlying custom LSTs remain subject to individual validator slashing risks
  • Secondary pool trades face potential depeg risk during liquidity shocks
Best forSolana holders seeking MEV yield, DeFi traders using yield-bearing collateral, Non-custodial SOL stakersSolana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokens

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

FAQ

Which protocol has lower fees, Jito or Sanctum?

Sanctum carries a lower baseline protocol fee at 0.1%, compared to Jito's 4% protocol fee. Sanctum also charges a 10 basis point deposit fee and a 1 basis point withdrawal fee when routing trades through its stake pool system.

How do unstaking times differ between Jito and Sanctum?

Jito withdrawals take one Solana epoch, which lasts roughly two to three days. Sanctum allows stakers to unbond immediately by trading receipt tokens directly through its Infinity liquidity pool and Router.

Do Jito or Sanctum require identity verification?

Jito does not require identity verification to stake, operating through non-custodial Solana smart contracts without KYC checks.

What receipt tokens do Jito and Sanctum issue?

Jito issues JitoSOL, an appreciating token that pools staking yield with MEV searcher tips. Sanctum issues the INF multi-LST liquidity token and supports over 1,300 custom partner tokens such as bbSOL and jupSOL.

More comparisons