Kiln vs Sanctum

How Kiln vs Sanctum compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

Kiln3.8/5
VS
Sanctum4.5/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.8/54.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield3.54.5
Security4.54.5
Liquidity3.05.0
Decentralization3.54.0
Ease of use4.04.5
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
TypeNative staking, Liquid staking, Restaking, Staking poolLiquid staking
Stakeable assetsETH, SOL, APT, ATOM, ALGO, AVAX, ADA, TIA, CRO, FET, FLR, IOTA, INJ, MON, NEAR, SEI, SUI, XTZ, TRX, BTC, GRAMSOL
Receipt tokenNot disclosedINF and validator LSTs
Protocol feeNot disclosed0.1%
ChainsEthereum, Solana, Aptos, Cosmos, Avalanche, Tron, Sui, Bitcoin, OtherSolana
Node operatorsKiln multi-cloud validator infrastructurePermissionless validator set with custom white-label pools
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking YesNot disclosed
Typical reward rate0% to 30%5.65%-5.69%
Company
Founded2018—
HeadquartersFrance—
Investors1kx, Consensys, KrakenNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure audited by Insight Assurance in June 2026
  • Integrates directly with enterprise custodians including Fireblocks and Ledger
  • Supports over 30 Proof-of-Stake blockchains from a unified API and dashboard
  • Allows direct non-custodial staking without relinquishing asset ownership
  • Connects over 1,360 Solana liquid staking tokens into shared liquidity
  • Audited by six firms including Quantstamp, OtterSec, and Halborn
  • Program upgrades secured by an 11-member multi-organization multisig
  • Enables immediate unbonding through liquidity pools rather than epoch waits
Cons
  • Targets institutions and enterprise developers rather than retail self-custody stakers
  • Exposes capital to protocol-specific unbonding queues and lockup periods
  • Experienced a past infrastructure issue that prompted an emergency validator exit
  • Withdrawal instructions incur a 0.10% fee
  • Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain
  • Underlying custom LSTs remain subject to individual validator slashing risks
  • Secondary pool trades face potential depeg risk during liquidity shocks
Best forCustodians and institutional asset managers, Wallets launching white-label Earn products, Institutions requiring SOC 2 certified stakingSolana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokens

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons