Kelp DAO vs Sanctum
How Kelp DAO vs Sanctum compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.3/5 | 4.5/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Security | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Decentralization | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Liquid restaking | Liquid staking |
| Stakeable assets | ETH, stETH, ETHx | SOL |
| Receipt token | rsETH | INF and validator LSTs |
| Protocol fee | Not disclosed | 0.1% |
| Chains | Ethereum | Solana |
| Node operators | Not disclosed | Permissionless validator set with custom white-label pools |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Typical reward rate | Not disclosed | 5.65%-5.69% |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | Laser Digital, SCB Limited, Alex Karl Svanevik, Amrit Kumar +22 | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Restaking native ETH and stETH, DeFi liquidity providers on L2s, Yield farming with restaked assets | Solana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokens |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.