GridPlus Lattice1 vs Tangem

GridPlus Lattice13.5/5

VS

Tangem4.3/5

Feature	GridPlus Lattice1Visit	TangemVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.5/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.0	4.5
Build & design	4.0	4.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.5
Coin support	2.5	4.5
Value for money	3.0	3.5
Specs
Connectivity	Not disclosed	NFC
Secure element	Yes	Yes
Firmware	Not disclosed	Partially open source
Display	Touchscreen	No screen
Air-gapped signing	Not disclosed	No
Bitcoin-only	Not disclosed	No
Supported assets	Not disclosed	14,100
Battery	Yes	No
BIP39 passphrase	Not disclosed	Yes
Companion app	Not disclosed	Tangem app
Touchscreen	Yes	No
Backup options	SafeCards	Two-card backup, Three-card backup, Optional recovery phrase
NFC	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	2020	2017
Headquarters	—	Switzerland
Investors	Not disclosed	Shima Capital, SBI Digital Asset Holdings
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	5-inch touchscreen shows decoded transaction details Separate GCE and SCE hardware environments Removable SafeCards support separate seed phrases Tamper mesh remains active for approximately five years unplugged	EAL6+ secure element from Samsung Semiconductors Battery-free card design removes charging and cable failure points Three-card sets provide two physical backups Supports 14,100+ assets across 90+ blockchains
Cons	SafeCard backups add a separate physical product to manage GCE compromise remains within the stated attack scope in some cases	Closed, factory-installed firmware cannot be updated No screen for independently checking transaction details Losing every linked card can remove wallet access App services add provider and smart-contract exposure
Best for	Ethereum and DeFi users, Readable contract signing, Physical seed backups	Long-term self-custody, Seedless wallet backups, NFC phone users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons