Cake Wallet vs Casa

Cake Wallet4.3/5

VS

Casa3.5/5

Feature	Cake WalletVisit	CasaVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.5	4.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Chain support	4.0	1.5
Features	4.0	3.5
Privacy	5.0	3.5
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Wallet type	Mobile, Desktop	Mobile
Custody	Self-custodial	Self-custodial
Chains	Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, Other	Bitcoin, Ethereum
Platforms	iOS, Android, macOS, Linux	iOS, Android
Open source	Yes	Not disclosed
Hardware wallet support	Yes	Yes
In-app swaps	Yes	Not disclosed
Staking	Not disclosed	No
Buy crypto in app	Yes	Yes
Security features	PIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-Fee	Multisig, Hardware wallet support, Emergency lockdown, Sovereign recovery, Inheritance planning, Video verification
Recovery without a seed phrase	No	Yes
Multisig	Not disclosed	Yes
Built-in dApp browser	No	No
Perpetuals trading	No	No
Company
Founded	2018	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Stillmark, Boost VC, Compound VC, Lerer Hippeau
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Fully open source under the MIT license Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option	Eliminates single seed-phrase points of failure through threshold multi-device signing Casa cannot move user funds unilaterally because it holds at most one key Hardware wallet diversity prevents single-vendor firmware supply chain compromises Integrated inheritance setup allows heirs to recover assets without seed technicalities
Cons	Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery	Requires ongoing paid subscriptions starting at $250 per year Supports only Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins rather than broad crypto ecosystems Lacks in-app decentralized finance tools, cross-chain swaps, and dApp browsing Recovery using Casa's co-signing key depends on active platform account status
Best for	Monero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware wallets	Long-term Bitcoin and Ethereum holders, Estates needing guided crypto inheritance, Organizations managing collaborative multi-key treasuries

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons