Bitpie vs Cake Wallet

Bitpie3.7/5

VS

Cake Wallet4.3/5

Feature	BitpieVisit	Cake WalletVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.7/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	3.5	4.5
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Chain support	4.0	4.0
Features	4.0	4.0
Privacy	3.5	5.0
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Wallet type	Mobile	Mobile, Desktop
Custody	Self-custodial	Self-custodial
Chains	Ethereum, Bitcoin, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Tron, Other	Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, Other
Platforms	iOS, Android	iOS, Android, macOS, Linux
Open source	Not disclosed	Yes
Hardware wallet support	Yes	Yes
In-app swaps	Yes	Yes
Staking	Yes	Not disclosed
Buy crypto in app	No	Yes
Security features	HD wallet structure, BITHD hardware pairing, 12-word seed phrase backup, Batch transfer security	PIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-Fee
Recovery without a seed phrase	No	No
Passkey login	No	Not disclosed
Multisig	Yes	Not disclosed
Built-in dApp browser	Yes	No
Perpetuals trading	No	No
Company
Founded	—	2018
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	China Merchants Bank	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	No security incidents across 12 years of core wallet operations Supports batch address generation of up to 1,000 addresses and batch transfers on Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRON, and USDT Pairs directly with BITHD Shield and Blade hardware wallets via Bluetooth Self-custodial setup with no mandatory KYC requirements for basic usage	Fully open source under the MIT license Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
Cons	Paying gas fees in USDT costs more than using native network tokens Frequent target of counterfeit mobile apps and impersonation phishing scams Discontinued USDT-Omni support and Pie Bank features in April 2021	Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
Best for	High-volume batch token senders, TRON and USDT active transferrers, BITHD hardware wallet owners	Monero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons