Bitget Wallet vs Cake Wallet

How Bitget Wallet vs Cake Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.8/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.54.0
Features4.54.0
Privacy2.55.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
Wallet typeMobile, Browser extension, WebMobile, Desktop
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Tron, OtherBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, ChromeiOS, Android, macOS, Linux
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Buy crypto in appNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresDESM mnemonic and private-key encryption, sha256 and aes256 storage, Go+ phishing and malicious-address alerts, SlowMist audit of Swap Protocol V2, Secure Asset FundPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-Fee
Recovery without a seed phrase Yes No
Built-in dApp browserNot disclosed No
Perpetuals trading Yes No
Company
Founded20182018
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Self-custodial control across 130+ blockchains
  • Supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and major Layer-2 networks
  • Aggregates hundreds of DEXs and cross-chain bridges
  • Gas payments support ETH, BGB, USDT and USDC
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
Cons
  • Swap costs vary by route, bridge, liquidity source and network
  • Self-custody leaves seed-phrase loss and phishing risks
  • Card availability depends on the user's region
  • Earn products expose funds to token and counterparty risk
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
Best forMulti-chain asset management, Cross-chain swap users, Crypto payment card usersMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons