Bitcoin.com vs Cake Wallet

How Bitcoin.com vs Cake Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.5/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support3.04.0
Features3.54.0
Privacy3.55.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Desktop
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, BNB Chain, OtherBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android, macOS, Linux
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnect YesNot disclosed
Security featuresNot disclosedPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-Fee
Recovery without a seed phraseNot disclosed No
Multisig YesNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browserNot disclosed No
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20152018
HeadquartersSaint Kitts and Nevis—
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Over 85 million wallets created since launch
  • Full self-custody architecture where users hold their own seed phrase
  • Integrated Verse DEX enables onchain swaps without leaving the app
  • Available across iOS, Android, and desktop in 175 countries
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
Cons
  • Fiat on-ramps rely on third-party providers requiring full KYC identity checks
  • Integrated DEX token swaps incur protocol swap fees and network gas costs
  • Missing recovery phrase results in permanent loss of funds
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
Best forBitcoin and Bitcoin Cash holders, Users wanting self-custodial mobile storage, Beginners buying crypto via cardMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons