BitBox vs Trezor

BitBox4.0/5

VS

Trezor4.0/5

Feature	BitBoxVisit	TrezorVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.5	4.5
Build & design	4.5	3.5
Ease of use	4.5	4.0
Coin support	3.5	4.5
Value for money	3.0	3.0
Specs
Secure element	Yes	Yes
Firmware	Fully open source	Fully open source
Display	Screen + buttons	Not disclosed
Bitcoin-only	Yes	No
Supported assets	Not disclosed	1,000
BIP39 passphrase	Not disclosed	Yes
Companion app	BitBoxApp	Trezor Suite
Backup options	microSD card, Recovery words	Wallet backup, Recovery phrase
Company
Founded	2015	2013
Headquarters	Switzerland	Czech Republic
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Fully open-source firmware and companion app EAL6+ secure chip with dual-chip design MicroSD backup plus 12 or 24 recovery words Bitcoin-only and Multi editions	100% open-source code and design Offline private-key storage with on-device transaction review Supports thousands of coins and tokens Works with more than 30 wallet integrations
Cons	BitBox02 Nova Bluetooth support is limited to iPhone and iPad The July 2026 Multi-edition signing issue required firmware 9.26.3 Recovery depends on securely storing a microSD card or recovery words Subscriber email addresses were exposed in a 2026 Brevo breach	Users must protect the wallet backup from loss or theft Buy, sell, and swap services may add provider and transaction costs Standard network fees still apply when sending crypto Supported assets and Suite services vary by asset and provider
Best for	Long-term Bitcoin self-custody, Open-source wallet users, iPhone and iPad owners	Long-term crypto self-custody, Open-source wallet users, Multichain asset holders

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons