Unchained vs Xapo Bank
How Unchained vs Xapo Bank compare on our ratings, earn platform specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Rates | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Transparency | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Flexibility | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Yes | Yes |
| Products | Crypto-backed loans | Savings / earn, Crypto-backed loans |
| Highest advertised APY | Not disclosed | 4.6% |
| Max loan-to-value | Not disclosed | 40% |
| Supported assets | 1 | Not disclosed |
| Available in | United States | United Kingdom, Global |
| Insurance | Not disclosed | Gibraltar Deposit Guarantee Scheme covers USD deposits up to £120,000 equivalent; Lloyd's of London covers BTC custody |
| Licenses & registrations | NMLS ID 1900773, NMLS ID 2656661, NMLS ID 2423070, California Financing Law License | Gibraltar banking licence (GFSC) |
| Flexible (withdraw any time) | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Fixed terms | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Auto-compounding | No | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | United States | Gibraltar |
| Investors | Valor Equity Partners, NYDIG, Stone Ridge Holdings Group | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | US long-term Bitcoin holders, Corporate treasuries borrowing against Bitcoin, Investors seeking verified non-rehypothecated loans | High-net-worth Bitcoin holders, Savers accumulating Bitcoin yield from cash, Borrowers seeking non-taxable liquidity |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

