Sanctum vs stakefish

Sanctum4.5/5

VS

stakefish3.6/5

Feature	SanctumVisit	stakefishVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.5/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	4.5	3.5
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	5.0	2.0
Decentralization	4.0	3.5
Ease of use	4.5	4.0
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Type	Liquid staking	Native staking, Restaking
Stakeable assets	SOL	ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM, POL, SUI
Receipt token	INF and validator LSTs	Not disclosed
Protocol fee	0.1%	4.3%
Chains	Solana	Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Cosmos, Sui, Other
Node operators	Permissionless validator set with custom white-label pools	stakefish internal infrastructure
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	Not disclosed	Yes
Typical reward rate	5.65%-5.69%	~6-7% APR on Solana
Company
Founded	—	2018
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Connects over 1,360 Solana liquid staking tokens into shared liquidity Audited by six firms including Quantstamp, OtterSec, and Halborn Program upgrades secured by an 11-member multi-organization multisig Enables immediate unbonding through liquidity pools rather than epoch waits	Zero percent consensus layer fee for native Ethereum validator deposits Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and withdrawal authority with delegators Runtime Verification audit completed on the Ethereum batch deposit smart contract Track record spanning over eight years without recorded slashing incidents
Cons	Withdrawal instructions incur a 0.10% fee Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain Underlying custom LSTs remain subject to individual validator slashing risks Secondary pool trades face potential depeg risk during liquidity shocks	Fifty percent execution layer fee reduces upside on large Ethereum MEV blocks Native Ethereum staking requires a full 32 ETH capital commitment Does not issue an in-house liquid staking receipt token for secondary market trading Unstaking speeds remain subject to protocol-level network unbonding queues
Best for	Solana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokens	Institutional stakers running full validators, Long-term holders seeking non-custodial delegation, Developers integrating multi-chain staking APIs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons