Sablier Labs vs Tenderly

Sablier Labs3.7/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	Sablier LabsVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.7/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	3.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	4.5
Pricing	4.0	3.5
Developer experience	4.0	5.0
Support	2.5	4.0
Specs
Services	Developer tooling	Developer tooling
Chains supported	25	50
Free tier	No	Yes
Pricing from	$0.99 per stream withdrawal	Not disclosed
Open source	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2019	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Daniel Bar, Evan Van Ness, Fenbushi Capital, Lito Coen	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Supports continuous, second-by-second token unlocks across 25 EVM networks Open-source smart contracts audited across multiple security reviews and contests Non-custodial infrastructure with over 838,000 transactions processed since 2019 Direct integration into Safe multisig wallets for DAO treasury streaming	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Entered maintenance mode in July 2026, targeting a full wind-down by June 2028 Interface withdrawal fee of $0.99 applied on modern Lockup and Flow streams Official Solana web interface was decommissioned in June 2026	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	DAOs executing continuous token vesting, Web3 organizations managing crypto payroll, Projects deploying Merkle-based token airdrops	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons