Chainstack vs Tenderly: Node Hosting vs EVM Debugging
Chainstack provides managed RPC endpoints, dedicated nodes, and subgraph indexing across more than 70 networks, including non-EVM chains like Solana, Bitcoin, and Sui. Tenderly focuses on Ethereum Virtual Machine environments, providing visual debugging and Virtual TestNets across 50 networks.
Network scope separates the platforms. Chainstack operates infrastructure across 10 global data centers with an advertised 99.99% uptime SLA, giving developers a free tier with 3 million monthly request units. Tenderly concentrates on pre-deployment testing and contract observability. Engineers can trace reverts and preview state changes directly in the interface. While Chainstack includes free RPC access on its base tier, Tenderly restricts its Node RPC service to paid plans.
Quick verdict
Architecture requirements guide the decision. Chainstack handles high-volume network connectivity across non-EVM and EVM chains, offering dedicated hardware and self-hosted options. Tenderly provides visibility into EVM execution through real-time alerts and line-by-line traces.
Choose Chainstack if you need managed or dedicated RPC access across networks like Bitcoin, Solana, and Ethereum. Its plans suit teams requiring flat-rate high-throughput endpoints, customer-owned hardware deployments through Self-Hosted, or free monthly quotas of 3 million request units starting at 25 RPS.
Use Tenderly for EVM contracts. Its toolchain fits developers testing cross-chain messages and simulating transaction failures across more than 50 compatible networks.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Pricing | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Developer experience | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Services | RPC / nodes, Indexing | Developer tooling |
| Chains supported | 70 | 50 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing from | $49/month | Not disclosed |
| Enterprise SLA | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Uptime SLA | 99.99% | Not disclosed |
| Free tier limits | 3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS | Not disclosed |
| Server regions | 10+ global data centers | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Spark Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure | Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.
FAQ
Does Chainstack support more blockchains than Tenderly?
Yes, Chainstack supports more than 70 chains, while Tenderly supports 50. Chainstack includes non-EVM networks such as Bitcoin, Solana, Sui, and TON, whereas Tenderly supports EVM chains exclusively.
Can you access free RPC nodes on both platforms?
Chainstack includes RPC endpoints on its free tier, but Tenderly limits Node RPC access to paid plans. Chainstack gives free accounts 3 million monthly request units at up to 25 RPS. Tenderly provides transaction simulation and debugging on its free tier instead.
Can Tenderly host dedicated blockchain nodes?
No, Tenderly does not offer dedicated physical node hosting. Chainstack provides Dedicated Nodes with isolated compute and storage starting at $678 per month, alongside a Self-Hosted control plane for customer-owned servers.
Which platform offers transaction simulation tools?
Tenderly provides native transaction simulation and visual trace debugging. Chainstack supplies raw node infrastructure and indexing endpoints, leaving transaction modeling and execution testing to client-side development environments.