Chainstack vs Hyperledger: Managed RPCs vs Open Frameworks
Chainstack is a managed blockchain infrastructure service based in Singapore that hosts RPC nodes, dedicated nodes, and subgraphs across more than 70 networks, including Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin. Hyperledger, operating under the Linux Foundation as LF Decentralized Trust, is an open-source organization based in San Francisco that maintains distributed ledger frameworks such as Fabric and Besu.
The primary divergence lies in hosting and operational responsibility. Chainstack delivers managed endpoints backed by a 99.99% uptime SLA, operating across 10 or more global data centers. It offers a free tier with 3 million monthly request units, after which paid tiers start at $49 per month. In contrast, Hyperledger distributes free, open-source software under the Apache-2.0 license. It does not run hosted RPC endpoints, maintain support help desks, or provide availability guarantees. Organizations deploying Hyperledger codebases manage their own compute and infrastructure upgrades.
Quick verdict
The core difference comes down to infrastructure ownership. Teams must decide between managed public blockchain endpoints and self-hosted consortium codebases. Chainstack handles node operations, continuous network updates, and global routing, which eliminates hardware overhead but carries recurring monthly subscription fees. Hyperledger provides free modular frameworks with zero vendor licensing costs, yet it demands dedicated internal engineering to configure peers and operate physical or cloud servers.
Choose Chainstack for turnkey access. It fits developers needing managed RPC connections to public networks like Ethereum, Solana, or Bitcoin without maintaining hardware, backed by a 99.99% uptime SLA and automated endpoint routing from a free tier up to dedicated server plans.
Hyperledger serves internal enterprise deployments. It is built for teams setting up a consortium or private permissioned network across multiple institutional partners. Its open-source tools such as Fabric and Besu eliminate platform subscription charges while providing total control over network membership and execution environments.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Pricing | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Developer experience | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Services | RPC / nodes, Indexing | RPC / nodes, Developer tooling |
| Chains supported | 70 | 2 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing from | $49/month | Free |
| Enterprise SLA | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Uptime SLA | 99.99% | Not disclosed |
| Free tier limits | 3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS | Open source codebases under Apache-2.0 license |
| Server regions | 10+ global data centers | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure | Financial institutions building private consortiums, Enterprises running private Ethereum networks, Developers deploying self-hosted identity infrastructure |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.
FAQ
What is the main difference between Chainstack and Hyperledger?
Chainstack is a commercial provider of managed RPC nodes across 70 networks, while Hyperledger is an open-source organization that develops distributed ledger software like Fabric and Besu. Chainstack hosts the infrastructure for you, whereas Hyperledger requires self-managed deployment.
Is Hyperledger cheaper to use than Chainstack?
Hyperledger codebases are free to download under the Apache-2.0 license, while Chainstack charges monthly fees starting at $49 once past its free tier. However, Hyperledger requires organizations to pay for their own server hosting, storage, and ongoing maintenance engineers.
Does Chainstack support Hyperledger frameworks?
Chainstack focuses on public and enterprise EVM networks like Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum rather than hosting Hyperledger Fabric consortia. Organizations using Hyperledger frameworks run their own instances or deploy them across customer-owned infrastructure.
Which platform provides an uptime SLA?
Chainstack provides a 99.99% uptime SLA on its managed infrastructure. Hyperledger does not offer service level agreements because it distributes open-source code rather than operating cloud node endpoints.