Relay vs Wormhole
How Relay vs Wormhole compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 3.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Speed | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Fees | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Not disclosed |
| Design | Intent-based | Messaging protocol |
| Chains | Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BNB Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, Sui, Tron, Other | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Sui, Aptos, Other |
| Chains supported | 85 | Not disclosed |
| Typical fee | Under $0.01 average cost plus dynamic execution fees | Not disclosed |
| Typical transfer time | 1 second | Not disclosed |
| Security model | Non-custodial depository with authorized signer oracle Hub and relayer settlement | Guardian network of 19 validators |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Token | Not disclosed | W |
| Intent-based | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Archetype, Union Square Ventures | Arrington Capital, Borderless Capital, Brevan Howard, Coinbase Ventures +17 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Fast native multi-chain transfers, Cross-chain stablecoin settlements, Developers building cross-chain checkout | Multichain application developers, Institutions issuing native assets, Cross-chain governance teams |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

