Relay vs Wormhole

How Relay vs Wormhole compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Relay4.3/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.52.5
Speed5.03.0
Fees4.53.0
Chain coverage4.54.5
Ease of use4.53.5
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
DesignIntent-basedMessaging protocol
ChainsEthereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BNB Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, Sui, Tron, OtherEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Sui, Aptos, Other
Chains supported85Not disclosed
Typical feeUnder $0.01 average cost plus dynamic execution feesNot disclosed
Typical transfer time1 secondNot disclosed
Security modelNon-custodial depository with authorized signer oracle Hub and relayer settlementGuardian network of 19 validators
Audited Yes Yes
TokenNot disclosedW
Intent-based YesNot disclosed
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Company
Founded20232020
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsArchetype, Union Square VenturesArrington Capital, Borderless Capital, Brevan Howard, Coinbase Ventures +17
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Average execution speed of one second across supported networks
  • No wrapped tokens used, settling directly in native destination assets
  • Average transaction fee sits below $0.01 plus network gas
  • Connects over 85 networks without pooled treasury lock-in
  • Connects more than 45 blockchains
  • Guardian network has 19 validators
  • Supports native token transfers through NTT
  • Published security report and open-source infrastructure
Cons
  • Verification hub depends on an authorized oracle signer architecture
  • Solver capacity limits maximum transfer size during volatile market conditions
  • Relay Vaults retired in late 2026, requiring manual user balance withdrawals
  • 2022 signature-verification exploit caused a loss above $320M
  • Guardian compromise could enable fraudulent cross-chain messages
  • Wrapped assets can depeg from their underlying assets
  • Route costs and transfer times vary by asset and chain
Best forFast native multi-chain transfers, Cross-chain stablecoin settlements, Developers building cross-chain checkoutMultichain application developers, Institutions issuing native assets, Cross-chain governance teams

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons