Relay vs Stargate

How Relay vs Stargate compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Relay4.3/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.0
Speed5.04.0
Fees4.54.0
Chain coverage4.54.5
Ease of use4.54.0
Specs
KYC required No No
DesignIntent-basedLiquidity network
ChainsEthereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BNB Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, Sui, Tron, OtherEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Other
Chains supported8550
Typical feeUnder $0.01 average cost plus dynamic execution feesNot disclosed
Typical transfer time1 secondNot disclosed
Security modelNon-custodial depository with authorized signer oracle Hub and relayer settlementLayerZero messaging
Audited Yes Yes
TokenNot disclosedSTG
Intent-based YesNot disclosed
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Company
Founded20232022
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsArchetype, Union Square VenturesNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Average execution speed of one second across supported networks
  • No wrapped tokens used, settling directly in native destination assets
  • Average transaction fee sits below $0.01 plus network gas
  • Connects over 85 networks without pooled treasury lock-in
  • Connects over 50 blockchains via LayerZero messaging
  • Bridges native assets directly without wrapped token depeg risks
  • No KYC checks or account registration required
  • Bug bounty program offering rewards up to $10 million on Immunefi
Cons
  • Verification hub depends on an authorized oracle signer architecture
  • Solver capacity limits maximum transfer size during volatile market conditions
  • Relay Vaults retired in late 2026, requiring manual user balance withdrawals
  • Dependent on LayerZero validator and relayer infrastructure
  • Subject to transfer delays or higher fees during pool liquidity imbalances
  • Phishing attacks targeted governance participants on Snapshot in December 2023
  • Deprecates low-volume chain endpoints periodically, requiring liquidity provider withdrawals
Best forFast native multi-chain transfers, Cross-chain stablecoin settlements, Developers building cross-chain checkoutDeFi traders moving native stablecoins, Developers needing omnichain asset routing, Cross-chain transfers without wrapped tokens

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons