Quicknode vs Tenderly

Quicknode4.2/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	QuicknodeVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	4.5
Pricing	4.0	3.5
Developer experience	4.5	5.0
Support	3.5	4.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Data APIs	Developer tooling
Chains supported	76	50
Free tier	Yes	Yes
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2017	2018
Headquarters	United States	United States
Investors	10T Holdings, Tiger Global Management, 776, SoftBank	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Processes over 500 billion requests monthly across 76 supported networks Offers a 99.99% uptime SLA for enterprise infrastructure Maintains SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, and ISO 27001 certifications Provides a free tier for early development and testing	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Reliance on centralized RPC nodes introduces counterparty infrastructure dependencies Proprietary filtering and pipeline tools can create vendor lock-in High-throughput enterprise deployments require custom pricing agreements	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	Web3 developers needing high-throughput RPC endpoints, Teams building real-time data pipelines with node filtering, Enterprises requiring SOC 2 certified node operations	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons