Pyth Network vs Tenderly

Pyth Network3.8/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	Pyth NetworkVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.0	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	4.5
Pricing	3.5	3.5
Developer experience	4.0	5.0
Support	3.0	4.0
Specs
Services	Oracle	Developer tooling
Chains supported	100	50
Free tier	Yes	Yes
Pricing from	$0/month	Not disclosed
Open source	Yes	Not disclosed
Token	PYTH	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.97%	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2021	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Bodhi Ventures, Borderless Capital, CMT Digital, Castle Island Ventures +6	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	500+ feeds across more than 100 blockchains Supports Ethereum, Solana, Sui and EVM-compatible chains Permissionless on-chain contracts Free Terminal plan at $0/month	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Hermes API access requires a Pyth API Key Pyth Pro Starter costs $500/month plus applicable tax Oracle users depend on publisher data accuracy Incorrect prices can affect liquidations and settlement	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	DeFi lending and derivatives, Multi-chain application developers, Institutional market-data teams	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons