Proofivy vs Tenderly

Proofivy2.8/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	ProofivyVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	2.8/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	3.0	4.5
Chain coverage	2.5	4.5
Pricing	3.0	3.5
Developer experience	3.0	5.0
Support	2.5	4.0
Specs
Services	Data APIs, Developer tooling	Developer tooling
Chains supported	2	50
Free tier	Not disclosed	Yes
Pricing from	0.001 ETH per public commit	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	—	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Stores only SHA-256 hashes, keeping source files and confidential data private x402 infrastructure automates USDC content monetization on Base for AI scraper traffic Converting existing timestamp proofs into tradeable NFTs carries zero platform fee Memberships allow organizations to bypass individual per-commit public fees	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Public commits carry a contract fee of 0.001 ETH plus network gas iOS application routes commits through a Proofivy-owned Ethereum wallet Users must independently retain raw source files to verify registered hashes	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	Publishers charging AI agents for content, Researchers timestamping lab discovery data, Creators needing verifiable date of creation	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons