Portal vs Relay

How Portal vs Relay compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Portal3.4/5
VS
Relay4.3/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.4/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.5
Speed3.05.0
Fees3.54.5
Chain coverage3.04.5
Ease of use3.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
DesignNot disclosedIntent-based
ChainsBitcoinEthereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BNB Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, Sui, Tron, Other
Chains supportedNot disclosed85
Typical feeNot disclosedUnder $0.01 average cost plus dynamic execution fees
Typical transfer timeNot disclosed1 second
Security modelBitScaler trustless multi-party atomic swap channels and non-custodial validator nodesNon-custodial depository with authorized signer oracle Hub and relayer settlement
AuditedNot disclosed Yes
TokenPTBNot disclosed
Intent-basedNot disclosed Yes
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Company
Founded20182023
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsPaloma Investments, Arrington CapitalArchetype, Union Square Ventures
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • No wrapped tokens or lock-and-mint bridge contracts
  • Non-custodial design leaves funds in user wallets until atomic settlement
  • Native support for Bitcoin, Runes, and Ordinals without synthetic minting
  • $92M in verified venture backing from Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, and Paloma Investments
  • Average execution speed of one second across supported networks
  • No wrapped tokens used, settling directly in native destination assets
  • Average transaction fee sits below $0.01 plus network gas
  • Connects over 85 networks without pooled treasury lock-in
Cons
  • Swap execution speeds are tied to Bitcoin base-layer confirmation times
  • Channel settlement remains vulnerable to elevated Bitcoin network fee spikes
  • Verification hub depends on an authorized oracle signer architecture
  • Solver capacity limits maximum transfer size during volatile market conditions
  • Relay Vaults retired in late 2026, requiring manual user balance withdrawals
Best forNative Bitcoin holders avoiding wrapped tokens, Traders exchanging Ordinals and Runes cross-chain, Developers integrating direct Bitcoin settlementFast native multi-chain transfers, Cross-chain stablecoin settlements, Developers building cross-chain checkout

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons