Osmosis Labs vs Raydium

Osmosis Labs4.0/5

VS

Raydium3.2/5

Feature	Osmosis LabsVisit	RaydiumVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	3.2/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing	3.0	4.5
Fees	4.5	3.5
Security	4.0	2.5
Ease of use	4.5	3.5
Chain coverage	4.0	2.5
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Type	AMM, Order book	AMM
Chains	Other	Solana
Swap fee	Varies by pool	0.25% on most pools; 0.01%, 0.05% or 1% on some tiers
Limit orders	Yes	Not disclosed
Cross-chain swaps	Yes	No
Open source	Yes	Not disclosed
Governance token	OSMO	RAY
Perpetual futures	Not disclosed	No
MEV protection	Yes	Not disclosed
Mobile app	Not disclosed	No
Points or rewards program	Yes	Yes
Company
Founded	2021	2021
Headquarters	Singapore	—
Investors	Paradigm, Do Kwon, Ethereal Ventures, Figment +2	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	No identity verification or KYC required for trading Gas fees can be paid in over 160 different supported assets Superfluid staking earns staking yields on active pool liquidity On-chain ProtoRev module captures MEV directly for the protocol	Runs without an account or KYC on Raydium itself About $1.18B TVL on 17 October 2026 Supports concentrated-liquidity pools on Solana Offers 0.01% and 0.05% fee tiers alongside standard 0.25% pools
Cons	IBC rate limiting can temporarily halt cross-chain transfers during sudden volume spikes Exposure to counterparty bridge exploits on wrapped non-native assets Total value locked stood at about $11.3 million in October 2026	Limited to the Solana ecosystem AMM execution brings slippage and impermanent-loss risk Failed transactions still consume Solana network fees Token-2022 transfer fees can increase total swap costs
Best for	Cosmos ecosystem token traders, Non-custodial cross-chain swappers, Concentrated liquidity yield providers	Solana token swaps, Concentrated-liquidity providers, Solana token launches

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons