Onramper vs Peer
How Onramper vs Peer compare on our ratings, on-ramp specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.0/5 | 3.4/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Coverage | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Payment methods | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Support | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Service | On-ramp, Off-ramp, Widget / API, Aggregator | On-ramp, Off-ramp |
| Payment methods | Card, Bank transfer, Apple Pay, Google Pay | Bank transfer |
| Typical fee | Generally no added fee for end users; the underlying provider sets the transaction rate. | Up to 0.95% taker service fee paid by the buyer; up to 0.5% bridge fee when bridging to another chain; sellers set their own spread. |
| Countries | 190 | Not disclosed |
| Assets | 2,000 | 12 |
| Developer widget / API | Yes | Not disclosed |
| KYC required | Yes | No |
| Sell to fiat (off-ramp) | Yes | Yes |
| Apple Pay | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Delivery time | Not disclosed | After payment verification, onchain release and any bridge route; timing varies by payment rail. |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Wallet and exchange developers, Apps needing global payment coverage, Businesses adding offramp flows | Payment-app crypto buyers, USDC sellers setting their own rates, Users seeking non-custodial ramps |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.