Nash vs SimpleSwap

How Nash vs SimpleSwap compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

Nash3.7/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.7/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees4.03.0
Security & trust4.54.0
Asset selection3.05.0
Ease of use3.54.5
Support3.04.0
Specs
MarketsSpotSpot
Maker fee0%Not disclosed
Coins listedNot disclosed2,800
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, Card, SEPACard
KYC required Yes No
Accepts US customers NoNot disclosed
Staking / earn YesNot disclosed
Mobile app Yes Yes
Licenses & registrationsModulr Finance B.V. DNB EMI, MiCA pending AFMNot disclosed
Security featuresNon-custodial, MPC co-signing, Address whitelisting, Custom withdrawal limitsNon-custodial architecture, Direct wallet settlements
Futures & perpetuals No No
Copy trading No No
P2P market No No
Earn / savings products YesNot disclosed
Referral program Yes Yes
Company
Founded—2018
HeadquartersLiechtenstein—
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Non-custodial architecture eliminates centralized exchange holding and insolvency risk
  • Zero percent maker fee on exchange trades
  • SEPA Instant settlement via dedicated personal Dutch euro IBAN accounts
  • Card spending features automated Bitcoin round-up conversions
  • No account registration required for standard crypto-to-crypto swaps
  • Non-custodial model delivers converted assets directly to personal wallets
  • Extensive catalog covering more than 2,800 cryptocurrencies
  • Choice between fixed guaranteed rates and floating market rates
Cons
  • Fiat ramp and high-yield Earn accounts temporarily paused pending Dutch MiCA approval
  • Fiat payment features and IBAN accounts are restricted to EEA and Swiss residents
  • Direct banking services support only euro transactions
  • Private key export from seed phrases is accessible only on the web app
  • Built-in exchange spreads can exceed traditional spot order-book trading fees
  • Transactions flagged by automated AML risk scoring trigger sudden KYC holds
  • No order books, limit orders, futures, or margin trading
  • Fiat purchases rely on third-party processors with separate fees and verification
Best forEEA traders requiring self-custody, Euro banking SEPA users, Zero-fee order book makersRegistration-free crypto-to-crypto swaps, Non-custodial cross-chain transfers, Trading rare altcoins without CEX balances

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons