mETH Protocol vs Sanctum
How mETH Protocol vs Sanctum compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.9/5 | 4.5/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Security | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Decentralization | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Liquid staking, Liquid restaking | Liquid staking |
| Stakeable assets | ETH | SOL |
| Receipt token | mETH / cmETH | INF and validator LSTs |
| Protocol fee | 10% | 0.1% |
| Withdrawal time | 1-5 minutes via Instant Buffer; ~24 hours via Aave pool | Not disclosed |
| Chains | Ethereum | Solana |
| Node operators | Not disclosed | Permissionless validator set with custom white-label pools |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Typical reward rate | 5.00% | 5.65%-5.69% |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Mantle Network DeFi participants, ETH holders seeking liquid restaking yield, Users needing fast withdrawal options | Solana holders seeking diversified yield, Validators launching branded LSTs, DeFi traders swapping liquid tokens |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

