Meteora vs rhino.fi

Meteora3.5/5

VS

rhino.fi4.0/5

Feature	MeteoraVisit	rhino.fiVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.5/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing	4.5	4.0
Fees	3.5	3.5
Security	3.5	4.0
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Chain coverage	2.5	4.5
Specs
Type	AMM	Not disclosed
Chains	Solana	Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, TON, Tron, Other
Limit orders	Yes	Not disclosed
Cross-chain swaps	No	Yes
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	MET	DVF
Perpetual futures	No	No
Routes across other DEXs	No	No
Points or rewards program	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2021	2019
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Solana-focused AMM with $5.955B in trailing 30-day DEX volume DLMM bins support concentrated liquidity strategies Limit orders can earn fees when swaps execute Audits cover DLMM, DAMM, DBC, vaults and staking products	Near-instant cross-chain execution settling in under 10 seconds Covers more than 30 blockchains including EVM networks, Solana, Tron, and Bitcoin Proprietary liquidity network eliminates third-party DEX aggregator slippage Smart contracts audited by PeckShield and CryptoExperts
Cons	Solana-only, with no cross-chain swap support Long-tail pools can carry thin liquidity and high slippage LPs face price-range risk and impermanent loss MET rewards depend on changing staking program rules	No swapping into ETH or BNB when bridging across chains Enterprise API access requires fixed monthly subscription plans Mandatory KYT screening applies to incoming deposits Sending from smart contracts is restricted on selected networks like Base
Best for	Solana token traders, Concentrated liquidity providers, Solana token launches	Cross-chain stablecoin bridging, Fintechs needing multi-chain deposits, Merchants accepting crypto payments

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons