Meld vs Paybis

Meld3.7/5

VS

Paybis4.2/5

Feature	MeldVisit	PaybisVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.7/5	4.2/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.0	3.5
Coverage	4.5	4.5
Payment methods	4.0	4.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.5
Support	3.0	4.0
Specs
Service	On-ramp, Off-ramp, Widget / API, Aggregator	On-ramp, Off-ramp, Widget / API
Payment methods	Not disclosed	Card, Bank transfer, Apple Pay, Google Pay, SEPA
Typical fee	Not disclosed	First card purchase: 0 Paybis fee. Other fees are shown at checkout and included in the quoted exchange rate.
Countries	184	180
Assets	629	Not disclosed
Developer widget / API	Yes	Yes
KYC required	Not disclosed	Yes
Sell to fiat (off-ramp)	Yes	Yes
Apple Pay	Not disclosed	Yes
Delivery time	Not disclosed	Within minutes for card purchases, subject to payment clearance and network congestion
Company
Founded	—	2014
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Lightspeed Faction, F-Prime Capital, Scytale Digital, Yolo Investments	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	184-country network coverage 54 local payment methods Provider selection uses price and conversion data Supports on-ramp and off-ramp flows	Serves more than 180 countries and 48 US states Offers over 35 payment methods First card purchase has a Paybis fee of 0 Sends crypto directly to an external wallet
Cons	Final fees vary by partner and payment method Coverage does not guarantee every asset or rail in each country KYC reviews can delay or restrict transactions Apps depend on third-party ramp and banking partners	Card fees and spreads vary by payment method Network fees apply to every transaction Paybis Wallet introduces custodial exposure KYC and payment options vary by region
Best for	Crypto apps adding fiat rails, Global stablecoin payment products, Remittance and payroll platforms	Card-based crypto purchases, Direct wallet delivery, EU and US on-ramp users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons