Marinade vs P2P.org

Marinade4.3/5

VS

P2P.org3.9/5

Feature	MarinadeVisit	P2P.orgVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.9/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	4.5	4.0
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	4.0	3.0
Decentralization	4.5	4.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Specs
KYC required	No	Not disclosed
Type	Liquid staking, Native staking	Native staking, Restaking
Stakeable assets	SOL	ETH, SOL, DOT, ATOM, XTZ, GRAM, TRX, ADA, APT, POL, TIA, HYPE, NEAR, SEI, SUI, MON
Receipt token	mSOL	Not disclosed
Minimum stake	Not disclosed	32 ETH for Ethereum validator
Chains	Solana	Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Polygon, Sui, Aptos, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, Other
Node operators	Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace	P2P.org validator infrastructure
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	No	Yes
Typical reward rate	5.04% - 7.6%	2.2% - 20.69%
Company
Founded	2021	2018
Headquarters	United States	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Supports native staking without smart contract custody exposure Liquid staking via mSOL is widely integrated across Solana DeFi Smart contracts audited by Neodyme, Ackee Blockchain, and Kudelski Security No identity verification or KYC required for retail staking	Over $10B in assets under validation across 40+ proof-of-stake networks Independent SOC 2 Type II certification verified by KirkpatrickPrice Zero slashing incidents recorded across seven years of validator operations MixBytes-audited smart contract infrastructure for institutional integrations
Cons	Limited entirely to the Solana blockchain mSOL trades at market rates and can temporarily depeg from redemption value Instant unstaking requires secondary market liquidity or pool reserves Standard native unstaking remains subject to Solana epoch withdrawal delays	Native Ethereum validator setup requires a minimum of 32 ETH Withdrawal timing remains subject to native chain unbonding rules and network queues EigenLayer restaking adds smart-contract risk and protocol-specific slashing conditions Primary API products and sales support cater to institutional and intermediary clients
Best for	Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians	Institutional digital asset treasuries, Custodians and wallet developers, Delegators seeking SOC 2-audited nodes

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons