Marinade vs Obol
How Marinade vs Obol compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 3.9/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Decentralization | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Not disclosed |
| Type | Liquid staking, Native staking | Staking pool |
| Stakeable assets | SOL | ETH |
| Receipt token | mSOL | stOBOL |
| Chains | Solana | Ethereum |
| Node operators | Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace | Distributed validator clusters |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | No | Not disclosed |
| Typical reward rate | 5.04% - 7.6% | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Pantera Capital, BlockTower Capital, Blockscape Lab, Coinbase Ventures +12 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians | Ethereum solo and squad stakers, Liquid staking node operator sets, Institutional validators requiring high uptime |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

