Marinade vs Obol

How Marinade vs Obol compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Obol3.9/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield4.53.5
Security4.54.5
Liquidity4.03.5
Decentralization4.54.5
Ease of use4.03.0
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
TypeLiquid staking, Native stakingStaking pool
Stakeable assetsSOLETH
Receipt tokenmSOLstOBOL
ChainsSolanaEthereum
Node operatorsAutomated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction MarketplaceDistributed validator clusters
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking NoNot disclosed
Typical reward rate5.04% - 7.6%Not disclosed
Company
Founded20212021
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsNot disclosedPantera Capital, BlockTower Capital, Blockscape Lab, Coinbase Ventures +12
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Supports native staking without smart contract custody exposure
  • Liquid staking via mSOL is widely integrated across Solana DeFi
  • Smart contracts audited by Neodyme, Ackee Blockchain, and Kudelski Security
  • No identity verification or KYC required for retail staking
  • Eliminates single points of failure by distributing validator duties across independent nodes
  • Supported by audits from Trail of Bits, Nethermind Security, and Zach Obront
  • Live day-one integration powering multi-operator vaults in Lido V3
  • Built-in fault tolerance keeps validators proposing even if individual nodes go offline
Cons
  • Limited entirely to the Solana blockchain
  • mSOL trades at market rates and can temporarily depeg from redemption value
  • Instant unstaking requires secondary market liquidity or pool reserves
  • Standard native unstaking remains subject to Solana epoch withdrawal delays
  • Adds network latency requirements across distributed nodes during threshold signing
  • Operates exclusively on Ethereum consensus infrastructure
  • Introduces middleware software exposure via the Charon client
Best forSolana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodiansEthereum solo and squad stakers, Liquid staking node operator sets, Institutional validators requiring high uptime

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons