Liquid Collective vs Marinade

Liquid Collective3.6/5

VS

Marinade4.3/5

Feature	Liquid CollectiveVisit	MarinadeVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.6/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	3.5	4.5
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	3.5	4.0
Decentralization	2.5	4.5
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Specs
KYC required	Yes	No
Type	Liquid staking	Liquid staking, Native staking
Stakeable assets	ETH	SOL
Receipt token	LsETH	mSOL
Protocol fee	10%	Not disclosed
Chains	Ethereum	Solana
Node operators	Allowlisted institutional operators	Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	Not disclosed	No
Slashing cover	Yes	Not disclosed
Typical reward rate	Not disclosed	5.04% - 7.6%
Company
Founded	—	2021
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Ethereal Ventures	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Slashing coverage from Nexus Mutual is built into the protocol Contracts audited by Spearbit, Halborn, Quantstamp, and OtterSec Node operators include enterprise providers such as Coinbase, Figment, and Blockdaemon TVL exceeded $663M as of October 2026	Supports native staking without smart contract custody exposure Liquid staking via mSOL is widely integrated across Solana DeFi Smart contracts audited by Neodyme, Ackee Blockchain, and Kudelski Security No identity verification or KYC required for retail staking
Cons	Mandatory KYC and AML checks for direct minting and burning Takes a 10% protocol service fee from staking rewards Slashing losses exceeding insurance are socialized across token holders Only supports Ethereum and Solana assets	Limited entirely to the Solana blockchain mSOL trades at market rates and can temporarily depeg from redemption value Instant unstaking requires secondary market liquidity or pool reserves Standard native unstaking remains subject to Solana epoch withdrawal delays
Best for	Institutions requiring KYC-compliant liquid staking, Enterprises wanting built-in slashing coverage, Institutional clients of Coinbase or FalconX	Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons