Kiln vs Marinade

How Kiln vs Marinade compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

Kiln3.8/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.8/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield3.54.5
Security4.54.5
Liquidity3.04.0
Decentralization3.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
KYC required No No
TypeNative staking, Liquid staking, Restaking, Staking poolLiquid staking, Native staking
Stakeable assetsETH, SOL, APT, ATOM, ALGO, AVAX, ADA, TIA, CRO, FET, FLR, IOTA, INJ, MON, NEAR, SEI, SUI, XTZ, TRX, BTC, GRAMSOL
Receipt tokenNot disclosedmSOL
ChainsEthereum, Solana, Aptos, Cosmos, Avalanche, Tron, Sui, Bitcoin, OtherSolana
Node operatorsKiln multi-cloud validator infrastructureAutomated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking Yes No
Typical reward rate0% to 30%5.04% - 7.6%
Company
Founded20182021
HeadquartersFranceUnited States
Investors1kx, Consensys, KrakenNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure audited by Insight Assurance in June 2026
  • Integrates directly with enterprise custodians including Fireblocks and Ledger
  • Supports over 30 Proof-of-Stake blockchains from a unified API and dashboard
  • Allows direct non-custodial staking without relinquishing asset ownership
  • Supports native staking without smart contract custody exposure
  • Liquid staking via mSOL is widely integrated across Solana DeFi
  • Smart contracts audited by Neodyme, Ackee Blockchain, and Kudelski Security
  • No identity verification or KYC required for retail staking
Cons
  • Targets institutions and enterprise developers rather than retail self-custody stakers
  • Exposes capital to protocol-specific unbonding queues and lockup periods
  • Experienced a past infrastructure issue that prompted an emergency validator exit
  • Limited entirely to the Solana blockchain
  • mSOL trades at market rates and can temporarily depeg from redemption value
  • Instant unstaking requires secondary market liquidity or pool reserves
  • Standard native unstaking remains subject to Solana epoch withdrawal delays
Best forCustodians and institutional asset managers, Wallets launching white-label Earn products, Institutions requiring SOC 2 certified stakingSolana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons