Kiln vs Marinade
How Kiln vs Marinade compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.8/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Decentralization | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Type | Native staking, Liquid staking, Restaking, Staking pool | Liquid staking, Native staking |
| Stakeable assets | ETH, SOL, APT, ATOM, ALGO, AVAX, ADA, TIA, CRO, FET, FLR, IOTA, INJ, MON, NEAR, SEI, SUI, XTZ, TRX, BTC, GRAM | SOL |
| Receipt token | Not disclosed | mSOL |
| Chains | Ethereum, Solana, Aptos, Cosmos, Avalanche, Tron, Sui, Bitcoin, Other | Solana |
| Node operators | Kiln multi-cloud validator infrastructure | Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | Yes | No |
| Typical reward rate | 0% to 30% | 5.04% - 7.6% |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | France | United States |
| Investors | 1kx, Consensys, Kraken | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Custodians and institutional asset managers, Wallets launching white-label Earn products, Institutions requiring SOC 2 certified staking | Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

