Jito vs Tonstakers

Jito4.2/5

VS

Tonstakers3.8/5

Feature	JitoVisit	TonstakersVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	3.8/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	4.5	4.0
Security	4.0	3.5
Liquidity	4.5	4.0
Decentralization	4.0	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	4.5
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Type	Liquid staking	Liquid staking
Stakeable assets	SOL	GRAM
Receipt token	JitoSOL	tsTON
Protocol fee	4%	Not disclosed
Minimum stake	Not disclosed	1 GRAM
Withdrawal time	1 epoch (~2-3 days)	Minutes
Chains	Solana	TON
Node operators	Jito-Solana validator network via StakeNet	Not disclosed
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	Yes	No
Typical reward rate	Not disclosed	Up to 21% APY
Company
Founded	2021	2023
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Multicoin Capital, 6th Man Ventures, Framework Ventures, Robot Ventures +1	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $1.09B in TVL on Solana as of October 2026 Dual yield stream combining standard staking rewards with MEV tips Requires no KYC checks or identity verification to stake Smart contracts audited by security firm Neodyme	Over $189M in total value locked across TON as of October 2026 Accessible 1 GRAM minimum deposit requirement Automated reward compounding every 18 hours Direct Telegram mini-app and TON wallet integrations without KYC
Cons	Restricted strictly to the Solana network Exposed to validator slashing and smart contract exploits JitoSOL secondary market trading carries receipt-token depeg risks	Exposure to tsTON market price depeg risk on secondary DEXs Limited to The Open Network without multichain options Requires keeping 1 GRAM reserved solely for network gas fees Smart contract risk from underlying validator and staking pools
Best for	Solana holders seeking MEV yield, DeFi traders using yield-bearing collateral, Non-custodial SOL stakers	TON network token holders, DeFi liquidity providers on TON, Users staking via Telegram wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons