Jito vs Liquid Collective
How Jito vs Liquid Collective compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.2/5 | 3.6/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Security | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Decentralization | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Yes |
| Type | Liquid staking | Liquid staking |
| Stakeable assets | SOL | ETH |
| Receipt token | JitoSOL | LsETH |
| Protocol fee | 4% | 10% |
| Withdrawal time | 1 epoch (~2-3 days) | Not disclosed |
| Chains | Solana | Ethereum |
| Node operators | Jito-Solana validator network via StakeNet | Allowlisted institutional operators |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Slashing cover | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | Multicoin Capital, 6th Man Ventures, Framework Ventures, Robot Ventures +1 | Ethereal Ventures |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Solana holders seeking MEV yield, DeFi traders using yield-bearing collateral, Non-custodial SOL stakers | Institutions requiring KYC-compliant liquid staking, Enterprises wanting built-in slashing coverage, Institutional clients of Coinbase or FalconX |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.