Infura vs Tenderly

Infura4.1/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	InfuraVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.0	4.5
Pricing	4.0	3.5
Developer experience	4.5	5.0
Support	3.5	4.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Data APIs	Developer tooling
Chains supported	40	50
Free tier	Yes	Yes
Pricing from	$50/month	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	6 million credits/day, 2,000 credits/second	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2016	2018
Headquarters	United States	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Free Core tier provides 6 million credits daily Direct native integration with MetaMask and Consensys tooling Supports over 40 blockchain networks and Layer 2s Target 99.99% uptime SLA on enterprise accounts	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Centralized RPC architecture creates single-point-of-failure risks Paid subscriptions start at $50 per month Strict rate limits apply on free tier throughput	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	Developers building on Ethereum and Linea, MetaMask SDK and Snaps integrations, Teams needing managed multi-chain RPC endpoints	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons