ELLIPAL vs Trezor

ELLIPAL4.1/5

VS

Trezor4.0/5

Feature	ELLIPALVisit	TrezorVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.5	4.5
Build & design	4.5	3.5
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Coin support	4.5	4.5
Value for money	3.5	3.0
Specs
Price from	$169	Not disclosed
Connectivity	QR code (air-gapped), microSD	Not disclosed
Secure element	Yes	Yes
Firmware	Closed source	Fully open source
Display	Touchscreen	Not disclosed
Air-gapped signing	Yes	Not disclosed
Bitcoin-only	No	No
Supported assets	10,000	1,000
Battery	Yes	Not disclosed
BIP39 passphrase	Not disclosed	Yes
Companion app	ELLIPAL mobile app for iOS and Android	Trezor Suite
Touchscreen	Yes	Not disclosed
Backup options	Seed phrase recovery sheets, MicroSD card	Wallet backup, Recovery phrase
Company
Founded	2018	2013
Headquarters	—	Czech Republic
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	QR-only signing keeps the wallet physically separate from phones CC EAL5+ secure element protects Titan 2.0 key storage Intrusion detection wipes stored data after physical opening Supports more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies	100% open-source code and design Offline private-key storage with on-device transaction review Supports thousands of coins and tokens Works with more than 30 wallet integrations
Cons	Titan 2.0 firmware is proprietary and closed-source $169 price Physical opening can wipe stored data Seed phrase loss can make wiped funds unrecoverable	Users must protect the wallet backup from loss or theft Buy, sell, and swap services may add provider and transaction costs Standard network fees still apply when sending crypto Supported assets and Suite services vary by asset and provider
Best for	Long-term self-custody, QR-based transaction signing, Touchscreen wallet users	Long-term crypto self-custody, Open-source wallet users, Multichain asset holders

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons