ELLIPAL vs GridPlus Lattice1

ELLIPAL4.1/5

VS

GridPlus Lattice13.5/5

Feature	ELLIPALVisit	GridPlus Lattice1Visit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.5	4.0
Build & design	4.5	4.0
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Coin support	4.5	2.5
Value for money	3.5	3.0
Specs
Price from	$169	Not disclosed
Connectivity	QR code (air-gapped), microSD	Not disclosed
Secure element	Yes	Yes
Firmware	Closed source	Not disclosed
Display	Touchscreen	Touchscreen
Air-gapped signing	Yes	Not disclosed
Bitcoin-only	No	Not disclosed
Supported assets	10,000	Not disclosed
Battery	Yes	Yes
Companion app	ELLIPAL mobile app for iOS and Android	Not disclosed
Touchscreen	Yes	Yes
Backup options	Seed phrase recovery sheets, MicroSD card	SafeCards
Company
Founded	2018	2020
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	QR-only signing keeps the wallet physically separate from phones CC EAL5+ secure element protects Titan 2.0 key storage Intrusion detection wipes stored data after physical opening Supports more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies	5-inch touchscreen shows decoded transaction details Separate GCE and SCE hardware environments Removable SafeCards support separate seed phrases Tamper mesh remains active for approximately five years unplugged
Cons	Titan 2.0 firmware is proprietary and closed-source $169 price Physical opening can wipe stored data Seed phrase loss can make wiped funds unrecoverable	SafeCard backups add a separate physical product to manage GCE compromise remains within the stated attack scope in some cases
Best for	Long-term self-custody, QR-based transaction signing, Touchscreen wallet users	Ethereum and DeFi users, Readable contract signing, Physical seed backups

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons