edgeX vs Uniswap

edgeX3.5/5

VS

Uniswap4.1/5

Feature	edgeXVisit	UniswapVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.5/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing	4.5	4.5
Fees	3.0	3.5
Security	3.0	4.0
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Chain coverage	3.0	4.5
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Type	Order book, Perpetuals	AMM
Chains	Arbitrum, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Other	Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Other
Limit orders	Yes	Yes
Cross-chain swaps	Not disclosed	Yes
Audited	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not disclosed	Yes
Governance token	EDGE	UNI
Perpetual futures	Yes	No
Routes across other DEXs	No	Yes
MEV protection	Not disclosed	Yes
Mobile app	Yes	Yes
Points or rewards program	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2023	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Polychain Capital, BlackRock, Andreessen Horowitz, Paradigm +8
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Self-custodial deposits and withdrawals require wallet authorization Order-book model supports limit-style market execution Perpetuals cover crypto, stocks and commodities Audits by RigSec, SlowMist and PeckShield	Non-custodial wallet trading across 16+ EVM mainnets V3 offers four published pool fee tiers V4 supports programmable hooks and concentrated liquidity UniswapX can shift gas payment to fillers
Cons	EDGE suffered a major flash crash on June 1, 2026 Perpetual trading introduces liquidation and oracle risks Up to 100x leverage increases loss exposure	Pool fees vary by market and network gas is separate Thin pools can produce high slippage and poor execution Liquidity providers face out-of-range and impermanent-loss risk V4 hooks and fillers add external smart-contract dependencies
Best for	Self-custodial perpetual traders, Order-book DEX users, Tokenized asset traders	On-chain token traders, Concentrated liquidity providers, Developers building EVM swaps

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons