deBridge vs Wormhole
How deBridge vs Wormhole compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 3.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Speed | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Fees | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Chain coverage | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Not disclosed |
| Design | Intent-based | Messaging protocol |
| Chains | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Other | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Sui, Aptos, Other |
| Chains supported | 26 | Not disclosed |
| Typical fee | 4 bps lowest spread | Not disclosed |
| Typical transfer time | 1.96 seconds median | Not disclosed |
| Security model | Decentralized validators and intent solver settlement without liquidity lockup | Guardian network of 19 validators |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Token | DBR | W |
| Intent-based | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | ParaFi Capital, Accomplice, AngelDAO, Animoca Brands +12 | Arrington Capital, Borderless Capital, Brevan Howard, Coinbase Ventures +17 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Solana to EVM arbitrageurs, High-speed native asset traders, Developers integrating cross-chain AI agents | Multichain application developers, Institutions issuing native assets, Cross-chain governance teams |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

