deBridge vs Mayan
How deBridge vs Mayan compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Fees | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Chain coverage | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Design | Intent-based | Intent-based |
| Chains | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Other | Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Hyperliquid, Other |
| Chains supported | 26 | Not disclosed |
| Typical fee | 4 bps lowest spread | Configurable integrator fee; dynamic driver execution costs |
| Typical transfer time | 1.96 seconds median | 2 to 60 seconds |
| Security model | Decentralized validators and intent solver settlement without liquidity lockup | Depends on route: Swift auctions, Circle CCTP or Wormhole |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Token | DBR | Not disclosed |
| Intent-based | Yes | Yes |
| Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) | Yes | Yes |
| Max transfer | Not disclosed | $10,000,000 |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | ParaFi Capital, Accomplice, AngelDAO, Animoca Brands +12 | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Solana to EVM arbitrageurs, High-speed native asset traders, Developers integrating cross-chain AI agents | Solana and EVM cross-chain traders, Users moving native USDC across networks, Traders lacking source chain native gas |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

