deBridge vs Jumper

How deBridge vs Jumper compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Jumper4.0/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Speed4.54.0
Fees4.04.5
Chain coverage4.04.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
KYC required No No
DesignIntent-basedAggregator
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, OtherEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Other
Chains supported2650
Typical fee4 bps lowest spread0% platform fee
Typical transfer time1.96 seconds medianNot disclosed
Security modelDecentralized validators and intent solver settlement without liquidity lockupDepends on the underlying bridge selected for each route
Audited YesNot disclosed
TokenDBRJUMP
Intent-based Yes Yes
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20212023
Headquarters—British Virgin Islands
InvestorsParaFi Capital, Accomplice, AngelDAO, Animoca Brands +12Multicoin Capital, Bloccelerate VC, Factor Capital, L1 Digital +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Median transfer settlement time of 1.96 seconds
  • Zero reported exploits since inception across 26+ audits
  • No wrapped token exposure due to native-to-native intent execution
  • Direct native bridging support for Solana and Tron
  • No platform fees added to underlying bridge or DEX costs
  • Routes across more than 50 blockchain networks including Solana and Ethereum
  • Processed over $40 billion in volume with 100,000+ monthly users
  • No account creation or KYC identity checks required
Cons
  • Unfilled orders can stall if solvers lack liquidity for a pair
  • Support for chains can be deprecated abruptly, such as Mantle and Plume in 2026
  • DBR token unlocks have previously triggered substantial secondary market price volatility
  • Security depends entirely on the third-party bridge chosen for each route
  • Multi-step transactions risk stuck funds if an underlying bridge stalls
  • Gas fees must be paid across multiple destination networks
Best forSolana to EVM arbitrageurs, High-speed native asset traders, Developers integrating cross-chain AI agentsMulti-chain DeFi traders, Users moving assets to non-EVM chains, Traders comparing real-time bridge routes

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons